Translate this page into:
Revisiting Ectopic Pregnancy: A Pictorial Essay
Address for correspondence: Dr. Artemis Petrides, 259 1st street, Mineola, New York 11501, USA. E-mail: apetrides@winthrop.org
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Ectopic pregnancies occur in approximately 1.4% of all pregnancies and account for 15% of pregnancy-related deaths. Considering the high degree of mortality, recognizing an ectopic pregnancy is important. Signs and symptoms of an ectopic pregnancy are nonspecific and include pain, vaginal bleeding, and an adnexal mass. Therefore, imaging can play a critical role in diagnosis. There are different types of ectopic pregnancies, which are tubal, cornual, cesarean scar, cervical, heterotopic, abdominal, and ovarian. Initial imaging evaluation of pregnant patients with pelvic symptoms is by ultrasonography, transabdominal, transvaginal or both. We review the sonographic appearance of different types of ectopic pregnancies that will aid in accurate and prompt diagnosis.
Keywords
Cervical
cesarean scar
cornual
heterotopic
ultrasonography of ectopic pregnancy
INTRODUCTION
An ectopic pregnancy is the implantation of a fertilized ovum outside the endometrial lining of the uterus. Ectopic pregnancies are estimated to occur in 1.4% of all pregnancies and account for 15% of pregnancy-related deaths.[1] The classic presentation of an ectopic pregnancy is the triad of abdominal or pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, and an adnexal mass. This presentation, however, occurs approximately 45% of the time and has a positive predictive value of only 14%.[1] In the majority of patients, symptoms are usually nonspecific and similar to normal early intrauterine gestation or miscarriage, such as amenorrhea, adnexal tenderness, and cervical motion tenderness. The prevalence of ectopic pregnancies is variable and related to patient population and inherent risk factors.
RISK FACTORS
Ectopic pregnancies can occur in any woman of child-bearing age. However, there are certain predisposing factors which can be additive. Risk factors include a prior ectopic pregnancy, tubal disease secondary to conditions like pelvic inflammatory disease, prior surgery that prevents passage of the zygote or delays the transit time, undergoing infertility treatment, a previous cesarean section, and maternal factors such as, increased age and parity.[1] There is a strong association between infertility and ectopic pregnancy, which is likely due to shared tubal abnormalities.[1] Ectopic pregnancy is also more commonly seen in smokers than in nonsmokers and is likely related to altered tubal motility.[2] The use of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is also a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy although lower than with no form of birth control. Pregnancies that do occur in the presence of an IUD have a higher than expected percentage of being an ectopic pregnancy.[3]
LABORATORY FINDINGS
Human chorionic gonadotropin can be detected in the serum approximately 9 days after conception.[2] Therefore, serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) assay is a sensitive test for pregnancy, with a negative test essentially excluding a live pregnancy. A negative level, however, does not exclude the presence of a chronic ectopic pregnancy.[4] There are different reference standards used in reporting β-HCG levels, with the third international standard (IS) and international reference preparation (IRP) being the most commonly used standards. An intrauterine gestational sac should be seen on transvaginal ultrasound when the β-HCG level is 1800-2000 mIU/ml using the IRP standard and by 5 weeks gestation.[24] In a healthy pregnancy, the β-HCG levels should double approximately every 2 days.[2]
IMAGING TECHNIQUES
Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography form the Gold Standard for evaluating the presence of ectopic pregnancies. Ultrasonographically, the uterus and adnexas are evaluated in sagittal and transverse orientations, which allows for direct evaluation and three-dimensional measurement of any identified extrauterine mass. Such measurements are important for treatment purposes. However, approximately 15-35% of ectopic pregnancies will not have an extrauterine mass identified on transvaginal sonograph.[5] Ultrasonographic examination should also include evaluation for the presence of free fluid by scanning the cul-de-sac, and also around the kidneys, pericolic gutters, perihepatic, and perisplenic areas to assess for a large hemoperitoneum.[4] Color Doppler imaging is also obtained to assess any abnormal flow patterns.[1]
ENDOMETRIAL CHANGES IN ECTOPIC PREGNANCY
An ectopic pregnancy may show some characteristic intrauterine findings. Such findings include a pseudo-gestational sac seen in 20% of patients with ectopic pregnancies (thick decidual reaction surrounding the intrauterine fluid located centrally in the endometrial canal), a trilaminar endometrium (an echogenic basal layer and a hypoechoic inner functional layer followed by a thin echogenic layer representing the interface with the endometrium lumen), or a thin-walled decidual cyst (at the junction of the endometrium and myometrium, seen in normal and abnormal pregnancies).[15]
TYPES OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCIES
Tubal pregnancy
Classical tubal extrauterine pregnancy is the most common type of ectopic pregnancy, accounting for approximately 95% of ectopic pregnancies. Majority of these occur in the ampulla (75-80%) and less commonly in the isthmus (12%) and fimbria (5%).[4] Ultrasonographically, an adnexal mass is identified when it lies separated from the ovary and presents with an independent motion between the mass and the ovary.[1] An ectopic pregnancy needs to be distinguished from any other adnexal mass [Figure 1]. An ectopic pregnancy may have a yolk sac or embryonic material, as well as a common imaging finding described as the ring sign, which is a hyperechoic ring surrounding the extrauterine gestational sac [Figure 2]. Similarly, the ring of fire sign shows peripheral hypervascularity of the hyperechoic ring and represents high-velocity, low-impedance flow surrounding the pregnancy [Figure 3]. The ring of fire sign, however, is nonspecific and can be seen around a normal maturing follicle or corpus luteal cyst [Figure 4].[5]
Interstitial pregnancy
Interstitial pregnancy occurs when the gestational sac is implanted in the myometrial segment of the fallopian tube in the intramural portion of the tube where it transverses the wall of the uterus to enter the endometrial canal. This is also known as a cornual or interstitial pregnancy [Figure 5]. This is an uncommon site for an ectopic pregnancy, accounting for approximately 2-4% of all ectopic pregnancies.[25] This type of ectopic pregnancy is eccentrically located high in the fundus and not surrounded by 5 mm of myometrium in all planes [Figure 6]. This allows for painless growth and has increased distensibility, which permits longer gestation and can result in pregnancies with as late as 16 weeks gestation.[5] In rare cases, approximately 10 cases reported in medical literature, unruptured interstitial pregnancy has resulted in live births.[6] This type of pregnancy can cause massive intraperitoneal hemorrhage [Figure 7] from the dilated arcuate arteries and veins that lie in the outer third of the myometrium between the thin outer myometrium and the thick intermediate layer. Mortality is twice that of other ectopic pregnancies as rupture can be life-threatening due to its proximity to the uterine artery. Interstitial line sign is an echogenic line that extends from the endometrial canal up to the corneal sac or hemorrhagic mass. It extends into the upper regions of the uterine horn and borders the margin of the intramural gestational sac. The line does not contain any thick echogenic decidual tissue that is confined to the endometrial canal. It does not extend into the intramural portion of the fallopian tube.[1]
Cervical pregnancy
Cervical pregnancy occurs when implantation is within the endocervical canal. This is a rare type accounting for less than 1% of ectopic pregnancies.[7] This type of ectopic pregnancy is associated with in vitro fertilization and local cervical pathology related to prior procedures like curettage or cesarean delivery. Ultrasonographically, one can see a gestational sac or placenta within the cervix, a normal endometrial stripe, and an hourglass- or a figure-eight-like structure as the fetus expands within the cervix [Figure 8]. The fetal heart can be detected below the internal os. A cervical pregnancy needs to be excluded from an incomplete abortion proximal to the cervix. There are different imaging characteristics to help distinguish between these two pathologies. In an incomplete abortion, the gestational sac is not adhered to the cervix, it is irregular in contour and shape, and the cervical os is open. This can be confirmed by the sliding sign. The transducer probe can manipulate the gestational sac, confirming non-adherence to the cervix. Cardiac activity may also be detected in a cervical pregnancy with a visible embryo which would not be present in an incomplete abortion.[5]
Ovarian pregnancy
Ovarian pregnancies occur when the ovum is fertilized and retained within the ovary. They account for 1-3% of all ectopic pregnancies.[45] There is a strong association with IUD usage and it often manifests as a heterotopic pregnancy or is associated with a tubal pregnancy. Ultrasonographically, a gestational sac, chorionic villi, or an atypical cyst with a hyperechoic ring can be identified within the ovary.[5] Bimanual evaluation may be necessary to evaluate a questionable ovarian ectopic pregnancy. If the mass moves separately from the ovary, then it is likely a tubal ectopic pregnancy, while if it moves with the ovary, it is likely a part of the ovary.[2]
Cesarean pregnancy
Cesarean section ectopic pregnancy is implantation within a uterine scar that is separate from the endometrial cavity. This is rare, occurring in 1 in 2000 pregnancies, and accounts for 6% of ectopic pregnancies in women with prior cesarean deliveries.[8] Implantation may have occurred via a wedge defect within the lower uterine segment or a microscopic fistula within the scar. The blastocyst is surrounded by myometrium and fibrous tissue.[9] Ultrasonographically, there is enlargement of the hysterotomy scar with an embedded mass and an empty uterus [Figure 9]. The trophoblast may be seen between the anterior uterine wall and the bladder with absence of myometrium between the gestational sac and the bladder.[4] There is risk that the trophoblast will extend beyond the uterus to involve the bladder. There may be thinning anteriorly by compression from the gestational sac, which can predispose the patient to rupture. This can be critical as it can lead to severe hemorrhage and hemodynamic collapse as there is usually prominent vascularity at the implantation site.[5]
Heterotopic pregnancy
Heterotopic pregnancy is one in which both intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancies occur simultaneously. This used to be rare, occurring 1 in 30,000 pregnancies; however, with the increase in assisted reproductive techniques, the overall incidence has increased to approximately 1 in 7000 pregnancies. This is likely secondary to the high prevalence of tubal damage in this population as well as the use of overstimulating medications for ovulation and multiple embryo implantations.[1] Detection of the ectopic pregnancy may be delayed given the presence of a live intrauterine pregnancy. Ultrasonographically, along with an intrauterine pregnancy, a complex mass may be seen in the adnexa [Figure 10]. This may consist only of a gestational sac, or an embryo may be present [Figure 11]. Associated findings may include a large hematoma, hematosalpinx, or fluid within the pelvis.
Abdominal pregnancy
Abdominal pregnancies occur when the implantation is within the peritoneal cavity. This is rare, representing approximately 1.4% of all ectopic pregnancies. Risk factors for abdominal pregnancy are pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, tubal damage, assisted reproductive techniques, and multiparity.[10] Sites of implantation include the omentum, pelvic sidewall, broad ligament, posterior cul-de-sac, abdominal organs, diaphragm, large pelvic vessels, and uterine serosa. Blood supply can be obtained from the omentum and abdominal organs.[11] Ultrasonographically, the uterus is empty with a gestational sac seen somewhere within the abdominal cavity, with or without components like a yolk sac or fetal structures.
CONCLUSION
Ectopic pregnancies are estimated to occur in 1.4% of all pregnancies and account for 15% of pregnancy-related deaths. Given this prevalence, a clinical presentation of abdominal or pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, and an adnexal mass in a woman with a positive β-HCG level and associated risk factors should raise the suspicion of an ectopic pregnancy. There are different types of ectopic pregnancies and knowledge of their imaging characteristics is critical in accurate and prompt diagnosis. Imaging modalities useful in diagnosis include ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The Gold Standard is transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI is being used increasingly as a problem solving tool.
Available FREE in open access from: http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/text.asp?2014/4/1/37/137817
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
REFERENCES
- The first trimester. In: Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Levine D, eds. Diagnostic Ultrasound (4th ed). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. :1099-110.
- [Google Scholar]
- Interstitial pregnancy resulting in a viable infant coexistent with massive perivillous fibrin deposition: A case report and literature review. Am J Perinatol Rep. 2014;4:29-32.
- [Google Scholar]
- Sites of ectopic pregnancy: A 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3224-30.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cesarean scar pregnancy: Issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:247-53.
- [Google Scholar]
- The forgotten child: A case of heterotopic, intra-abdominal and intrauterine pregnancy carried to term. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1372-4.
- [Google Scholar]
- Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:192-4.
- [Google Scholar]